From: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: unaccent contrib |
Date: | 2011-09-26 14:15:00 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.64.1109261814080.26195@sn.sai.msu.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Tom Lane wrote:
> Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> writes:
>> On 21-09-2011 13:28, Daniel VАzquez wrote:
>>> "unaccent" is compatible with postgresql 8.4 (but not is in their contrib
>>> version distribution)
>
>> No, it is not. AFAICS it is necessary to add some backend code that is not in 8.4.
>
> [ pokes at it ] Yeah, you are right. The version of unaccent that is
> in our source tree is a filtering dictionary, and therefore cannot
> possibly work with backends older than 9.0 (when the filtering
> dictionary feature was added).
>
> So I'm wondering where the OP read that it was compatible with 8.4.
> Our own documentation about it certainly does not say that. It's
> possible that Oleg and Teodor had some prototype version, different
> from what got committed to our tree, that would work in 8.4.
AFAIR, the last version without filtering feature is
http://www.sigaev.ru/misc/unaccent-0.2.tar.gz
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru)
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-09-26 14:21:30 | Re: Is there any plan to add unsigned integer types? |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-09-26 14:13:46 | Re: contrib/sepgsql regression tests are a no-go |