From: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
---|---|
To: | Artur Dabrowski <ad(at)astec(dot)com(dot)pl> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Incorrect FTS result with GIN index |
Date: | 2010-07-20 09:09:06 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.64.1007201303160.32129@sn.sai.msu.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Artur,
I recommend post your problem to -hackers mailing list. I have no idea,
what could be a problem.
My machine is:
uname -a
Linux mira 2.6.33-020633-generic #020633 SMP Thu Feb 25 10:10:03 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
PostgreSQL 8.4.4 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu9) 4.4.1, 64-bit
As a last resort I recommend you to compile pg yourself and see if the
problem exists.
Oleg
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Artur Dabrowski wrote:
>
> I tested the same backup on our CentOS 5.4 virtual machine (running on xen
> server) and the results are really weird (118 rows, comparing to 116 on win
> xp and 123 expected):
>
> Aggregate (cost=104.00..104.01 rows=1 width=0) (actual
> time=120.373..120.374 rows=1 loops=1)
> -> Bitmap Heap Scan on search_tab (cost=5.35..103.93 rows=25 width=0)
> (actual time=59.418..120.137 rows=118 loops=1)
> Recheck Cond: ((to_tsvector('german'::regconfig, keywords) @@
> '''ee'':*'::tsquery) AND (to_tsvector('german'::regconfig, keywords) @@
> '''dd'':*'::tsquery))
> -> Bitmap Index Scan on idx_keywords_ger (cost=0.00..5.34 rows=25
> width=0) (actual time=59.229..59.229 rows=495 loops=1)
> Index Cond: ((to_tsvector('german'::regconfig, keywords) @@
> '''ee'':*'::tsquery) AND (to_tsvector('german'::regconfig, keywords) @@
> '''dd'':*'::tsquery))
> Total runtime: 120.670 ms
>
> And here are the configuration details:
>
> PostgreSQL:
> postgresql84-server-8.4.4-1.el5_5.1
>
> # uname -r
> 2.6.18-164.15.1.el5xen
>
> # cat /etc/redhat-release
> CentOS release 5.4 (Final)
>
> # cat /proc/cpuinfo
> processor : 0
> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
> cpu family : 6
> model : 15
> model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5140 @ 2.33GHz
> stepping : 6
> cpu MHz : 2333.416
> cache size : 4096 KB
> physical id : 0
> siblings : 1
> core id : 0
> cpu cores : 1
> fpu : yes
> fpu_exception : yes
> cpuid level : 10
> wp : yes
> flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic sep cmov pat clflush acpi mmx
> fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall lm constant_tsc pni cx16 lahf_lm
> bogomips : 5835.83
> clflush size : 64
> cache_alignment : 64
> address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
> power management:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Oleg Bartunov wrote:
>>
>> Artur,
>>
>> I don't know, but could you try linux machine ?
>>
>> Oleg
>>
>
>
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru)
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jennifer Trey | 2010-07-20 09:18:59 | Re: Create table if not exists ... how ?? |
Previous Message | Harald Fuchs | 2010-07-20 08:11:21 | Re: index scan and functions |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-07-20 09:31:23 | string_to_array has to be stable? |
Previous Message | Itagaki Takahiro | 2010-07-20 08:12:28 | Re: sql/med review - problems with patching |