Re: damage control mode

From: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: damage control mode
Date: 2010-02-08 18:38:56
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.64.1002082138350.16860@sn.sai.msu.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Josh Berkus wrote:

> On 2/8/10 7:31 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> Eh? Previously we allowed code to go in with documentation to be
>>> written after feature freeze. Is this no longer acceptable?
>
> My $0.0201115:
>
> Depends on the feature, I'd say. If it's sufficiently obvious to test
> the feature without full documentation, then sure. If, however,
> reviewers can't adequately test the patch because they don't know all of
> the syntax being implemented, then docs are a requirement.

+1

Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru)
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-02-08 19:17:15 Re: review: More frame options in window functions
Previous Message Greg Stark 2010-02-08 18:34:01 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb)