Re: Full backup - pg_dumpall sufficient?

From: Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gerhard Wiesinger <lists(at)wiesinger(dot)com>, "Raymond O'Donnell" <rod(at)iol(dot)ie>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Full backup - pg_dumpall sufficient?
Date: 2009-01-30 01:43:06
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.64.0901291741510.5307@discord.home.frostconsultingllc.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Tom Lane wrote:

> Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com> writes:
>> Tom one thing I noticed recently is that pg_dumpall --globals doesn't
>> seem to pick up when you alter the GUCs at the database level and
>> neither does pg_dump. How should you dump to grab that per-database
>> stuff?
>
> Regular pg_dumpall will catch that.
>
> There's been some previous discussion about redrawing the dividing lines
> so that this doesn't fall between the cracks when you try to use
> --globals plus per-database pg_dump, but AFAIR nothing's been done about
> it yet. It's a bit tricky since it's not entirely clear who's
> responsible for creating the individual databases when you restore in
> that scenario.

I guess I could pg_dumpall -s | grep "ALTER DATABASE" to grab that stuff.

--
Jeff Frost, Owner <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>
Frost Consulting, LLC http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/
Phone: 916-647-6411 FAX: 916-405-4032

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2009-01-30 01:53:37 Re: Pet Peeves?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-01-30 01:06:41 Re: [GENERAL] Encoding problem using pg_dumpall