From: | Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Gerhard Wiesinger <lists(at)wiesinger(dot)com>, "Raymond O'Donnell" <rod(at)iol(dot)ie>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Full backup - pg_dumpall sufficient? |
Date: | 2009-01-30 01:43:06 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.64.0901291741510.5307@discord.home.frostconsultingllc.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com> writes:
>> Tom one thing I noticed recently is that pg_dumpall --globals doesn't
>> seem to pick up when you alter the GUCs at the database level and
>> neither does pg_dump. How should you dump to grab that per-database
>> stuff?
>
> Regular pg_dumpall will catch that.
>
> There's been some previous discussion about redrawing the dividing lines
> so that this doesn't fall between the cracks when you try to use
> --globals plus per-database pg_dump, but AFAIR nothing's been done about
> it yet. It's a bit tricky since it's not entirely clear who's
> responsible for creating the individual databases when you restore in
> that scenario.
I guess I could pg_dumpall -s | grep "ALTER DATABASE" to grab that stuff.
--
Jeff Frost, Owner <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>
Frost Consulting, LLC http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/
Phone: 916-647-6411 FAX: 916-405-4032
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2009-01-30 01:53:37 | Re: Pet Peeves? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-30 01:06:41 | Re: [GENERAL] Encoding problem using pg_dumpall |