From: | Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dennis Brakhane <brakhane(at)googlemail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: index scan cost |
Date: | 2008-07-17 23:12:44 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.64.0807171611510.4738@discord.home.frostconsultingllc.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Dennis Brakhane wrote:
> The "fast" server makes a much more accurate estimation of the number
> of rows to expect (4 rows are returning, 1 was estimated). The "slow"
> server estimates 1151 rows. Try running ANALYZE on the slow one
You're quite right. I probably didn't mention that the slow one has been
analyzed several times. In fact, every time adjusted the statistics target
for that column I analyzed, thus the eventually better, but still inaccurate
estimates toward the bottom of the post.
--
Jeff Frost, Owner <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>
Frost Consulting, LLC http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/
Phone: 650-780-7908 FAX: 650-649-1954
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-18 04:37:31 | Re: index scan cost |
Previous Message | Dennis Brakhane | 2008-07-17 22:58:23 | Re: index scan cost |