From: | Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: insert/update tps slow with indices on table > 1M rows |
Date: | 2008-06-04 15:10:38 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.64.0806041607120.3987@aragorn.flymine.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, andrew klassen wrote:
> I am using multiple threads, but only one worker thread for insert/updated to this table.
> I don't mind trying to add multiple threads for this table, but my guess is it would not
> help because basically the overall tps rate is decreasing so dramatically. Since
> the cpu time consumed by the corresponding postgresĀ server process for my thread is
> small it does not seem to be the bottleneck. There has to be a bottleneck somewhere else.
> Do you agree or is there some flaw in my reasoning?
There is indeed a flaw in your reasoning - there may be very little CPU
time consumed, but that just indicates that the discs are busy. Getting
Postgres to do multiple things at once will cause a more efficient use of
the disc subsystem, resulting in greater overall throughput. This is
especially the case if you have multiple discs in your box.
Matthew
--
Contrary to popular belief, Unix is user friendly. It just happens to be
very selective about who its friends are. -- Kyle Hearn
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lewis Kapell | 2008-06-04 15:18:28 | Re: backend pid changing |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-06-04 15:10:08 | Re: backend pid changing |