Re: tsearch2: plainto_tsquery() with OR?

From: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: cluster <skrald(at)amossen(dot)dk>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: tsearch2: plainto_tsquery() with OR?
Date: 2007-08-09 05:34:15
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.64.0708090928140.18739@sn.sai.msu.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Tom Lane wrote:

> Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
>> On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, cluster wrote:
>>> Does anyone know where I can request an OR-version of plainto_tsquery()?
>
>> plainto_tsquery expects plain text, use to_tsquery for boolean operators.
>
> Are either of these definitions really right? If I type "foo bar baz"
> into Google, for instance, it seems to produce some sort of weighted
> result, neither a strict AND nor a strict OR. Google didn't get where
> they are by misjudging what the simplest search behavior should be like.

we provide strict basic query language via to_tsquery(), which could be
a foundation for different ql. We need consensus here and we leave it for
future. Someone could write google like ql, but I didn't see any description
what exactly google does. Currently, people write their own search wrappers
which implement google-like ql.

Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru)
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-08-09 05:42:24 Re: tsearch2: plainto_tsquery() with OR?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-08-09 05:09:15 Re: tsearch2: plainto_tsquery() with OR?