| From: | Joshua_Kramer <josh(at)globalherald(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres |
| Date: | 2007-08-08 17:43:34 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.64.0708081338550.13447@home-av-server.home-av |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
> I do think this language harms PostgreSQL because it makes it sound like
> previously it was only available in unprofessional packaging, which implies
Erg, I have a dumb question. What does this package provide over and
above the standard PG .msi's available for Windows? Is it merely a
consistency so that Linux newbies can get an easy Postgres package too?
I'm just wondering. I would beleive that those inclined to develop using
MySQL would also be inclined to develop under Windows - I didn't find it
difficult at all to install PG 8.2.4 or pgAdminIII on my C5 boxes...
Cheers,
-J
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-08-08 17:48:44 | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres |
| Previous Message | Lewis Cunningham | 2007-08-08 17:31:01 | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-08-08 17:48:44 | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres |
| Previous Message | Lewis Cunningham | 2007-08-08 17:31:01 | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres |