Re: Take your postgresSql on the road, and live to tell of it.

From: Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>
To: Owen Hartnett <owen(at)clipboardinc(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Take your postgresSql on the road, and live to tell of it.
Date: 2007-08-07 23:06:42
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.64.0708071604590.27105@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

You can group schemas with views, and it guarentees nobody will accidently
overwrite somebody else's stuff. Merging a two schemas with identical
table structure should also be quite trivial. Of course, if you have a lot
of users, this might not work so well....

On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Owen Hartnett wrote:

> At 2:15 PM -0700 8/7/07, Ben wrote:
>> How many users do you have? Have you considered giving each user a schema
>> in which to make their changes? It sounds like you don't really have a
>> multi-master replication issue, which makes things easier.
>
> Maybe I'm not understanding the strategy, but I don't see what this buys me,
> as I have to end up with a single database schema that has incorporated all
> the changes. If I can "record" all the SQL a user does from the checkpoint
> on, then I can "psql <" it in to the main database. Once I've combined their
> data into the database that sits on the server, I don't need their database
> copies anymore.
>
> -Owen
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message novnov 2007-08-07 23:25:28 Re: Reordering columns, will this ever be simple?
Previous Message Decibel! 2007-08-07 22:59:20 Re: Intelligent Database in postgreSQL