From: | JoshuaKramer <josh(at)globalherald(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Advocacy List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: (wtf) Top 20 Open Source Software Projects in the Enterprise |
Date: | 2007-07-24 14:59:12 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.64.0707241049410.10823@home-av-server.home-av |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
> 1. A lot more people know MySQL and thus can be hired, and in theory be
> immediately productive.
> 2. MySQL people are cheaper. On average from the people I talk to 30-40%
> cheaper than a qualified PostgreSQL DBA.
My response: if you are an A/V production company wanting to buy new
equipment, do you go to Wal*Mart and buy the $999 Plasma TV Special, or do
you go to an A/V supply house and buy a good, commercial-quality unit for
$2400?
I know I'm preaching to the choir, but consider: is your 40% cheaper MySQL
admin going to know how to secure your data properly so you don't loose a
few bits here and there? If your data is only ancillary to your business
- like if you're a plumber and connecting pipes is your thing - them MySQL
might be OK, and your 40% cheaper admin would fit the bill.
If, however, you depend on your data, then it's worth paying for someone
who knows their salt.
On a somewhat related topic - how is MySQL 5 wrt reliability? Let's say
you have a database that uses innodb and does type checking - is MySQL as
robust as PGSQL when it comes to being able to pull the plug out of the
socket (or deal with HW errors)?
Cheers,
-J
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2007-07-24 14:59:52 | Re: (wtf) Top 20 Open Source Software Projects in the Enterprise |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-07-24 14:54:50 | Re: (wtf) Top 20 Open Source Software Projects in the Enterprise |