Re: Array indexes, GIN?

From: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Array indexes, GIN?
Date: 2007-03-02 06:45:03
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.64.0703020942310.400@sn.sai.msu.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Adam,
>
>> On the surface, looks like a job for GIN, but GIN seems undocumented,
>> specifically mentions it doesn't support the deletes we'll have many of
>> since it's designed for word searching apparently, the performance
>> implications are undocumented. I searched, I read, and even IRC'd, and
>> it seems like GIN is just not used much.
>
> It's new (as of 8.2). And the authors, Oleg and Teodor, are notorious for
> skimpy documetentation.

We're getting better, we have 72 pages written about new FTS :)

>
> I'd start with the code in INTARRAY contrib module (also by Teodor) and bug
> them on pgsql-hackers about helping you implement a GIN index for arrays.

GIN already has support for one dimensional arrays and intarray, particularly,
too has support of GiN.

Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru),
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message hytech.qa 2007-03-02 06:46:31 Hibernate left join
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-03-02 05:48:08 Re: Improving query performance