| From: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
|---|---|
| To: | Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_trgm performance |
| Date: | 2007-02-26 13:10:17 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.64.0702261608280.400@sn.sai.msu.ru |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Guillaume Smet wrote:
> On 2/26/07, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> wrote:
>> Did you rewrite query manually or use rewrite feature of tsearch2 ?
>
> Currently, it's manual. I perform a pg_trgm query for each word of the
> search words (a few stop words excluded) and I generate the ts_query
> with the similar words instead of using the search words.
> Is there any benefit of using rewrite() in this case?
not really, just a matter of possible interesting architectural design.
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru)
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gauri Kanekar | 2007-02-26 13:22:19 | Server Startup Error |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Smet | 2007-02-26 12:58:20 | Re: pg_trgm performance |