Re: replication choices

Just to be clear, this effectively means I double my database writes,
correct?

On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 03:17:40PM -0800, Ben wrote:
>> the remote sites back to the central site, each remote site needs to have
>> a normal slony node first, which I don't have the hardware for.
>
> An answer for this, though a dirty kludge, is to replicate to another
> database in the same cluster. This is really no more load than the
> single replication user, although it is expensive at the disk level.
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
> The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace.
> --Philip Greenspun
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/
>