From: | Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | dcrespo <dcrespo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgres Replication |
Date: | 2007-01-09 22:18:29 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.64.0701091416590.8626@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
If you only want to use one database at a time you might look into using
DRBD. It's a linux block-level package that is like raid-1 over the
network.
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, dcrespo wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have two computers with a Postgres Database each. I want one of them
> to be the replica of the other one; let's say I want a Master to Master
> replication in order to use either one (but only one at a time) as the
> main database: in case of failure, switch. The ideal synchronization
> way would be Synchronous. However, these two computers are going to be
> next to each other, so the asynchronous synchronization would be fast
> enough (I don't really know. Can you tell so?) for the case synchronous
> sync is not available.
>
> What I have found so far is Daffodil and Slony-I. Daffodil's name
> doesn't even appear in Postgresql.org, which is not the case for
> Slony-I. So there's a big point in favor to Slony-I.
>
> Has anybody researched on this that can point me in the right
> direction?
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> Daniel Crespo
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2007-01-09 22:30:31 | Re: Newbie Constraint ? |
Previous Message | Andrew Kroeger | 2007-01-09 22:16:02 | Re: ERROR: invalid memory alloc request size, and others |