Re: Postgres Replication

From: Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>
To: dcrespo <dcrespo(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres Replication
Date: 2007-01-09 22:18:29
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.64.0701091416590.8626@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

If you only want to use one database at a time you might look into using
DRBD. It's a linux block-level package that is like raid-1 over the
network.

On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, dcrespo wrote:

> Hi everybody,
>
> I have two computers with a Postgres Database each. I want one of them
> to be the replica of the other one; let's say I want a Master to Master
> replication in order to use either one (but only one at a time) as the
> main database: in case of failure, switch. The ideal synchronization
> way would be Synchronous. However, these two computers are going to be
> next to each other, so the asynchronous synchronization would be fast
> enough (I don't really know. Can you tell so?) for the case synchronous
> sync is not available.
>
> What I have found so far is Daffodil and Slony-I. Daffodil's name
> doesn't even appear in Postgresql.org, which is not the case for
> Slony-I. So there's a big point in favor to Slony-I.
>
> Has anybody researched on this that can point me in the right
> direction?
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> Daniel Crespo
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2007-01-09 22:30:31 Re: Newbie Constraint ?
Previous Message Andrew Kroeger 2007-01-09 22:16:02 Re: ERROR: invalid memory alloc request size, and others