Re: opportunity to benchmark a quad core Xeon

From: Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>
To: Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing(at)tweakers(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: opportunity to benchmark a quad core Xeon
Date: 2006-12-18 17:20:57
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.64.0612180919450.15313@discord.home.frostconsultingllc.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, Arjen van der Meijden wrote:

> On 16-12-2006 4:24 Jeff Frost wrote:
>> We can add more RAM and drives for testing purposes. Can someone suggest
>> what benchmarks with what settings would be desirable to see how this
>> system performs. I don't believe I've seen any postgres benchmarks done on
>> a quad xeon yet.
>
> We've done our "standard" benchmark on a dual X5355:
> http://tweakers.net/reviews/661
>
> Verdict is that for a price/performance-ratio you're better off with a 5160,
> but in absolute performance it does win.
>

Arjen,

Have you guys run your benchmark on a quad opteron board yet? I'm curious how
the dual quad core Intels compare to quad dual core opteron.

--
Jeff Frost, Owner <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>
Frost Consulting, LLC http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/
Phone: 650-780-7908 FAX: 650-649-1954

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steven Flatt 2006-12-18 17:51:13 Re: Insertion to temp table deteriorating over time
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-12-18 17:07:58 Re: Query plan changing when queried data does not