| From: | Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql-committers shouldn't be the default "developers" |
| Date: | 2006-01-11 10:19:33 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.63.0601111206430.20797@evim.gunduz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Hi,
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> At minimum the list description needs to be filled in, in a way that
> will discourage people from posting questions there. Perhaps
>
> This list carries CVS commit log messages, and occasionally
> followup discussions arising from them.
(I was about to write an e-mail about this subject)
* We could set a reply-to header for -committers list. I think the best
could be -hackers lists. The followups should continue there.
* Only the committer people should be able to post to this list (I don't
mean regular posts. I mean the automated posts via the commit process).
Other posts should be "rejected" automatically, instead of being held for
moderator approval.
Regards,
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Archeron | 2006-01-12 17:45:32 | Search.postgresql.org down. |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-01-11 08:01:35 | Re: pgsql-committers shouldn't be the default "developers" list |