Re: PG 8.0.4, Centos and 64 bit

Hi,

On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Brian Mathis wrote:

> Also, are there any rpms for this setup? I looked in the binary section for
> rpms, but all the directories were empty.

We currently don't have a x86_64 server that runs RHEL 4. That's why
there are no RPMs for that arch (I've uploaded RPMs for many platforms
BTW). If someone wants to assist us to build RPMs for that platform,
please contact me. We'll give you all the necesarry information.

Regards,
--
Devrim GUNDUZ
Kivi Bilişim Teknolojileri - http://www.kivi.com.tr
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org
>From pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org Mon Oct 17 18:37:10 2005
X-Original-To: pgsql-general-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679BDD7B4F
for <pgsql-general-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:37:09 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 16128-09
for <pgsql-general-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org>;
Mon, 17 Oct 2005 21:37:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from bos-gate3.raytheon.com (bos-gate3.raytheon.com [199.46.198.232])
by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE0BD7AC5
for <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:37:07 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from ds02e00.directory.ray.com (ds02e00.directory.ray.com [147.25.130.245])
by bos-gate3.raytheon.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9HLb8hF027380
for <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:37:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ds02e00 (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ds02e00.directory.ray.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id j9HLb2SI016738
for <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 21:37:02 GMT
Received: from ds02e00.directory.ray.com with LMTP by ds02e00 (2.0.6/sieved-2-0-build-559)
for <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 21:37:01 +0000
Received: from notesserver5.ftw.us.ray.com (notesserver5.ftw.us.ray.com [151.168.70.34])
by ds02e00.directory.ray.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id j9HLathx016703
sender Richard_D_Levine(at)raytheon(dot)com for <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 21:36:57 GMT
In-Reply-To: <10656(dot)1129574664(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.2 June 01, 2004
Message-ID: <OFAC12F719(dot)7542EE85-ON0525709D(dot)007663C5-0525709D(dot)0076BBEA(at)ftw(dot)us(dot)ray(dot)com>
From: Richard_D_Levine(at)raytheon(dot)com
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:36:53 -0500
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on NotesServer5/HDC(Release 6.5.2|June 01, 2004) at 10/17/2005
04:36:57 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-SPAM: 0.00
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.204 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.026, NO_REAL_NAME=0.178]
X-Spam-Level:
X-Archive-Number: 200510/1022
X-Sequence-Number: 85251

pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org wrote on 10/17/2005 01:44:24 PM:

<snip>
>
> (BTW, has anyone looked lately to see how far away Postgres is from
> being able to run SAP?)

Uh, Tom? Are you in the habit of waiving red capes in front of bulls? :)

I assume the question was rhetorical, due to MySQL's capability gap with
PostgreSQL.

>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly