Re: Fedora Core 3 x86_64 compat libraries?

From: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: Jan Söderback <jsoderba(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fedora Core 3 x86_64 compat libraries?
Date: 2005-10-06 21:15:27
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.63.0510070013410.19388@mail.kivi.com.tr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


Hi again,

On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Jan Söderback wrote:

> Is that package compatible with 8.0.4?

I forgot to reply this.

Yes, but please do not download 8.0.4 RPMs now. New sets of 8.0.4 RPMs
will be released this weekend (marked as 2PGDG). The current ones are a
bit buggy and will be replaced with new ones.

Regards,

--
Devrim GUNDUZ
Kivi Bilişim Teknolojileri - http://www.kivi.com.tr
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org
>From pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org Thu Oct 6 19:00:03 2005
X-Original-To: pgsql-general-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D07DA42C
for <pgsql-general-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org>; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 18:13:50 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 03134-02
for <pgsql-general-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org>;
Thu, 6 Oct 2005 21:13:45 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.kivi.com.tr (mail.kivi.com.tr [213.143.254.37])
by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC83DA068
for <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 18:13:45 -0300 (ADT)
Received: by mail.kivi.com.tr (Postfix, from userid 1009)
id A2242E81D6; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 00:13:16 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.kivi.com.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D5DE8132;
Fri, 7 Oct 2005 00:13:16 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 00:13:16 +0300 (EEST)
From: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
X-X-Sender: devrim2(at)mail(dot)kivi(dot)com(dot)tr
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_S=F6derback?= <jsoderba(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fedora Core 3 x86_64 compat libraries?
In-Reply-To: <f16438fb0510060451l1f00bfecvfa4019b201474501(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
Message-ID: <Pine(dot)LNX(dot)4(dot)63(dot)0510062300560(dot)19388(at)mail(dot)kivi(dot)com(dot)tr>
References: <f16438fb0510060451l1f00bfecvfa4019b201474501(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Kivi-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-Kivi-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-Kivi-MailScanner-From: devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.005 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.005]
X-Spam-Level:
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=iso-8859-9; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-ID: <Pine(dot)LNX(dot)4(dot)63(dot)0510070009151(dot)19388(at)mail(dot)kivi(dot)com(dot)tr>
X-Archive-Number: 200510/304
X-Sequence-Number: 84533

hi,

On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Jan Söderback wrote:

> I have an AMD64 Fedora Core 3 server with Postgresql 8.0.1 that I want
> to upgrade to the latest version. Since 8.0.2 incremented the libpq
> version I can't install the official RPM packages. I found a
> message[1] to this list which had a compat-postgresql-libs[2] RPM, but
> that's an i686 package. Where can I find a x86_64 version or source
> for this package? Is that package compatible with 8.0.4?
>
> [1] http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-05/msg01240.php
> [2] http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/compat-postgresql-libs-3-2PGDG.i686.rpm

http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/compat/compat-postgresql-libs-3-3PGDG.src.rpm

is the SRPM. Also I've just built the x86_64 RPM for you:

http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/compat/compat-postgresql-libs-3-3PGDG.x86_64.rpm

Regards,

--
Devrim GUNDUZ
Kivi Bilişim Teknolojileri - http://www.kivi.com.tr
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org
>From pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org Thu Oct 6 19:05:44 2005
X-Original-To: pgsql-general-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E76CDA450
for <pgsql-general-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org>; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 19:05:01 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 13772-09
for <pgsql-general-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org>;
Thu, 6 Oct 2005 22:04:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.pha.pa.us [64.139.89.126])
by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B0ADA44C
for <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 19:04:55 -0300 (ADT)
Received: (from pgman(at)localhost)
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id j96M4ni08050;
Thu, 6 Oct 2005 18:04:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Message-Id: <200510062204(dot)j96M4ni08050(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas
In-Reply-To: <20051006201803(dot)GE6026(at)ns(dot)snowman(dot)net>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 18:04:49 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: "Aly S.P Dharshi" <aly(dot)dharshi(at)telus(dot)net>,
"Gavin M. Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.01 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.010]
X-Spam-Level:
X-Archive-Number: 200510/305
X-Sequence-Number: 84534

Stephen Frost wrote:
> UNICODE means "UTF-8"
> This is an interesting point. To be perfectly honest, it seems like
> Postgres' UNICODE/UTF-8/etc support could stand to be somewhat better.
> I've not used it much myself but I do see comments about it on the
> lists from time to time. I think there was some work done on this
> for 8.1 and I expect support will only continue to improve in these
> areas.

Yes, this is completely fixed in 8.1, except we allow UNICODE to be a
synonym for UTF-8. We also added Win32 support for UTF8 in 8.1.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dann Corbit 2005-10-06 21:17:58 Re: License question
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2005-10-06 21:03:24 Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas