| From: | "Aly S(dot)P Dharshi" <aly(dot)dharshi(at)telus(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Aly S(dot)P Dharshi" <aly(dot)dharshi(at)telus(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas |
| Date: | 2005-10-06 19:19:33 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.63.0510061316490.22990@edtnas67.telus.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Okay that is a fair statement to make, hence restating:
- What is the status of those items listed on the PostgreSQL gotchas
- Are they bugs ?
- Are they valid statements ?
- If they are bugs are they resolved ?
- What does the PG community thing of this list of gotchas ?
http://sql-info.de/postgresql/postgres-gotchas.html
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Gavin M. Roy wrote:
> Then wouldn't it be more appropriate to ask:
>
> What's the status of the things listed on the PostgreSQL gotchas. Are they
> bugs? Are they valid? Have the been resolved? What does the community thing
> of those gotchas?
>
> I personally don't take an open ended question like "URL: Any comments?" as
> trying to be productive. But I could also just be burnt out on the whole
> PgSQL vs MySQL flame war or reading too much into what I appraised to be terse
> email. If so I apologize.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gavin
--
Aly S.P Dharshi
aly(dot)dharshi(at)telus(dot)net
"A good speech is like a good dress
that's short enough to be interesting
and long enough to cover the subject"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2005-10-06 19:21:01 | Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas |
| Previous Message | Gavin M. Roy | 2005-10-06 19:14:34 | Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas |