From: | Fabien COELHO <fabien(at)coelho(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Install pg_regress script to support PGXS? |
Date: | 2005-09-29 13:24:15 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.63.0509291509480.23120@briare.cri.ensmp.fr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Tom,
> While testing the recent pgxs patch, I noticed that you can build and
> install contrib with PGXS:
> ...
> It seems that it ought to work to run installcheck too:
> gmake USE_PGXS=1 installcheck
> but this does not quite work because the pg_regress script isn't
> included in the installation tree. (If you copy it to where it'd
> need to be, installcheck works.)
>
> Is it worth including pg_regress in the installation to make this
> work? Seems like it might be handy for external modules to be able
> to run self-tests.
Indeed, I noticed this when I did pgxs;-) It is on my todo list for
postgresql, but I haven't had time much time this year to contribute
anything.
The reason it was not included at first is that it seemed to me that
selftests require a temporary installation which make sense easilly when
building from sources, but I was not sure about what would be really
needed for the feature out of the compilation tree (special conf files,
diff/comparison commands...). I was planning to investigate the details,
but if the pg_regress command is enough, that was a little bit stupid of
me not to do it directly. ISTM that the pg_regress command is not compiled
by default, only under "make test", so it should be added to the default
compilation?
--
Fabien.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD | 2005-09-29 13:28:27 | Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? |
Previous Message | R, Rajesh (STSD) | 2005-09-29 13:05:14 | Query in SQL statement |