From: | arsi(at)aranzo(dot)netg(dot)se |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: String handling function, substring vs. substr |
Date: | 2006-10-02 16:57:15 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.62.0610021856320.28792@aranzo.netg.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
Hi all,
> brian <brian(at)zijn-digital(dot)com> writes:
>> arsi(at)aranzo(dot)netg(dot)se wrote:
>>> Does this mean that substr calls substring internally?? Or is it the
>>> other way around?? Or are they independent of each other??
>
>> Looks like they're pretty evenly matched.
>
> Actually, a bit of poking into the contents of pg_proc will show you
> that they are both aliases for the same C function (text_substr_no_len).
> So they should be *exactly* the same speed.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Thanks Brian for your answer (although that wasn't what I was looking for,
I was looking for Tom's answer).
Thanks Tom for your answer.
Archie
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | uwcssa | 2006-10-02 17:35:34 | Unsubscribe |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-10-02 16:49:36 | Re: 回覆: Re: [ADMIN] How can I restore fr |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Staubo | 2006-10-02 17:25:12 | Re: Weird disk write load caused by PostgreSQL? |
Previous Message | Anibal David Acosta F. | 2006-10-02 16:15:45 | Re: using float4, I get incorrect value when select |