From: | Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | John A Meinel <john(at)arbash-meinel(dot)com> |
Cc: | Anjan Dave <adave(at)vantage(dot)com>, Geoffrey <esoteric(at)3times25(dot)net>, Mischa Sandberg <mischa(dot)sandberg(at)telus(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Whence the Opterons? |
Date: | 2005-05-09 17:08:27 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.62.0505091007540.14627@discord.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 9 May 2005, John A Meinel wrote:
> Well, I'm speaking more from what I remember reading, than personal
> testing. Probably 50% is too high, but I thought I remembered it being
> more general than just specific cases.
Anadtech had a benchmark here:
http://www.anandtech.com/linux/showdoc.aspx?i=2163&p=2
It's a little old, as it's listing an Opteron 150 vs 3.6 Xeon, but it does
show that the opteron comes in almost twice as fast as the Xeon doing
Postgres.
--
Jeff Frost, Owner <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>
Frost Consulting, LLC http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/
Phone: 650-780-7908 FAX: 650-649-1954
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | William Yu | 2005-05-09 17:23:34 | Re: Whence the Opterons? |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-05-09 16:51:33 | Re: [PERFORM] "Hash index" vs. "b-tree index" (PostgreSQL |