Re: PGDG RPMS and integer-datetimes support

From: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: S Murthy Kambhampaty <smk_va(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PGDG RPMS and integer-datetimes support
Date: 2005-04-07 16:34:47
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.61.0504071932390.10384@emo.org.tr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, S Murthy Kambhampaty wrote:

> Can integer datetimes support be added to the PGDG
> distributed RPMS for Fedora at the next version
> requiring an initdb.

Could you please tell us why integer datetimes should be enabled in our
RPMs by default?

We are not sure that many people need it, also it's easy for someone to
add this support using the SRPMs provided.

Regards,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.tdmsoft.com http://www.gunduz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCVWEptl86P3SPfQ4RAgYHAJ937NqHHL7VUP7wH7TUnDQ6M1lC4QCg2GwW
dRMyXYCBPG0tfirf53RAG1Y=
=uYoW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message fred 2005-04-07 22:52:12 Limited to 100 connections
Previous Message Marcin Giedz 2005-04-07 09:58:49 Re: Problem with backup...