Re: Comment forms in interactive docs

From: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Comment forms in interactive docs
Date: 2004-09-03 05:36:41
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.61.0409030827460.32393@emo.org.tr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Tom Lane wrote:

>> There are comments forms interactive docs. I think we should remove them.
>> Who follows the user comments in there? I'm sure, noone!
>
> Actually, we've made a practice of scavenging for useful comments at
> least once a release cycle. There's a lot of crud in there, I agree,
> but some good ideas about missing material too. Anyway, what is your
> idea of "interactive" docs if not ones that people can comment on?

IMHO, the difference between static and interactive docs 'should' be that
interactive one is searchable.

Anyway, I don't like forums, I prefer mailing lists but if we could set up
a forum, ppl who are not a member of MLs would be a member of it -- since
they would just read the messages they want.

Regards,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ
devrim~gunduz.org devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.tdmsoft.com
http://www.gunduz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBOALstl86P3SPfQ4RApNaAJ9UJUMRz7l05dneC9VjGlXiEeRtFACfSs2o
sQAd2ZFO0fjuyFW+RyUJwIg=
=GSqv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GUNDUZ 2004-09-03 05:39:44 Re: Comment forms in interactive docs
Previous Message Robert Treat 2004-09-03 05:28:12 Re: Comment forms in interactive docs