Re: fix schema ownership for database owner on first

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fix schema ownership for database owner on first
Date: 2004-06-08 16:00:02
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.60.0406081752030.23621@sablons.cri.ensmp.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


>> Ok, so I guess I can use regressionuser[123], regression[123] as names in
>> the validation. Writing tests cases is not fun, so I tried to put some fun
>> by using these characters.
>
> I don't really think it's necessary for the regression tests to test
> this functionality.

Hummm... an interesting view, indeed. It fits neither my experience of
programming nor my experience of computer security;-)

It taught me that anything which is not tested does not work or will not
work later on because someone will break some assumption.

On the other hand, I understand that heavy test on "make check" are not
necessary. So maybe some "make big_check" or the like?

--
Fabien Coelho - coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-06-08 17:13:01 Re: cost_nonsequential_access()
Previous Message Manfred Koizar 2004-06-08 15:50:58 Re: cost_nonsequential_access()