From: | "Brandon Metcalf" <bmetcalf(at)nortel(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL on Solaris 8 and ufs |
Date: | 2005-03-23 17:16:29 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.58L.0503231113410.24435@cash.rhiamet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
a == ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca writes:
a> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 03:23:18PM -0600, Brandon Metcalf wrote:
a> > s> What are you using to measure
a> > s> performance?
a> >
a> > Nothing too scientific other than the fact that since we have moved
a> > the DB, we consistenly see a large number of postmater processes
a> > (close to 100) where before we did not.
a> What did you move from? The Solaris ps (not in ucb, which is the
a> BSD-style ps) shows the parent process name, so everything shows up
a> as "postmaster" rather than "postgres". There's always one back end
a> per connection.
a> If you are in fact using more connections, by the way, I can tell you
a> that Solaris 8, in my experience, is _very bad_ at managing context
a> switches. So you may not be merely I/O bound (although your other
a> reports seem to indicate that you are).
We moved from an HP-UX 10.20 box where the pgsql installation and data
were on a vxfs fileystem.
And we're definitely seeing more connections at a time which indicates
that each process is taking longer to complete.
--
Brandon
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Arthurs | 2005-03-23 17:32:07 | Re: PostgreSQL on Solaris 8 and ufs |
Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2005-03-23 16:58:07 | Re: PostgreSQL on Solaris 8 and ufs |