Re: ideas for auto-processing patches

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To: markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net
Subject: Re: ideas for auto-processing patches
Date: 2007-01-04 23:34:03
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0701051030370.2840@linuxworld.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:

> 1. Pull source directly from repositories (cvs, git, etc.) PLM
> doesn't really track actually scm repositories. It requires
> directories of source code to be traversed, which are set up by
> creating mirrors.

It seems to me that a better approach might be to mirror the CVS repo --
or at least make that an option -- and pull the sources locally. Having to
pull down >100MB of data for every build might be onerous to some build
farm members.

Thanks,

Gavin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum 2007-01-04 23:44:44 Re: Problem with windows installer
Previous Message Ken Johanson 2007-01-04 23:08:52 V4 protocol, extensible?