Re: Use of 8192 as BLCKSZ in xlog.c

From: Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>
To: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Use of 8192 as BLCKSZ in xlog.c
Date: 2005-11-22 03:01:47
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0511212200260.17240@eon.cs
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Michael Glaesemann wrote:

>
> Would it make sense to abstract that out so it's clear that it's
> *not* related to BLCKSZ? Or maybe just a comment would be enough.
>

"Insprite of incremental improvement", I think rename "buf" to "str" would
work,

Regards,
Qingqing

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2005-11-22 03:12:10 Re: Are NULLs in Arrays compressed?
Previous Message Michael Glaesemann 2005-11-22 02:57:52 Re: Use of 8192 as BLCKSZ in xlog.c