Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance

On Sun, 23 Oct 2005, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> If we're going to create a separate thread, there is no need to deal
> with APCs at all, I beleive. We can just use the existing timeout
> functionality in WaitForSingleObjectEx(), which simplifies the code a
> bit.

[ Finally I copied it from the website. Don't know why I can't find it in
my email reader or news reader. ]

Yeah, this is better.

> PS. Qingqing: it helps at least me if you can post your patch as an
> attached file instead of inline. That makes absolutely sure my mailer
> (yeah, I know...) doesn't get a chance to break the lines.

Yeah, several times I want to submit with an attachment, but I got an
error message saying that "I can't post a binary to a non-binary group".
If any one happens to use pine newsreader and know the solution, please
let me know, thanks.

Regards,
Qingqing