Re: Query plan looks OK, but slow I/O - settings advice?

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)alcove(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Roger Hand <RHand(at)kailea(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Query plan looks OK, but slow I/O - settings advice?
Date: 2005-08-19 07:17:45
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0508191710450.31045@linuxworld.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

The query plan does *not* look okay.

> electric=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE
> electric-# SELECT datavalue, logfielddatatype, timestamp FROM logdata_recent
> electric-# WHERE (logfielddatatype = 70 OR logfielddatatype = 71 OR logfielddatatype = 69)
> electric-# AND graphtargetlog = 1327
> electric-# AND timestamp >= 1123052400 AND timestamp <= 1123138800
> electric-# ORDER BY timestamp;
> QUERY PLAN
> --------------------------------------------------
> Sort (cost=82.48..82.50 rows=6 width=14) (actual time=60208.968..60211.232 rows=2625 loops=1)
> Sort Key: public.logdata_recent."timestamp"
> -> Result (cost=0.00..82.41 rows=6 width=14) (actual time=52.483..60200.868 rows=2625 loops=1)
> -> Append (cost=0.00..82.41 rows=6 width=14) (actual time=52.476..60189.929 rows=2625 loops=1)
> -> Seq Scan on logdata_recent (cost=0.00..46.25 rows=1 width=14) (actual time=0.003..0.003 rows=0 loops=1)
> Filter: (((logfielddatatype = 70) OR (logfielddatatype = 71) OR (logfielddatatype = 69)) AND (graphtargetlog = 1327) AND ("timestamp" >= 1123052400) AND ("timestamp" <= 1123138800))
> -> Index Scan using logdata_recent_1123085306_ix_t_fld_gtl, logdata_recent_1123085306_ix_t_fld_gtl, logdata_recent_1123085306_ix_t_fld_gtl on logdata_recent_stale logdata_recent (cost=0.00..18.08 rows=3 width=14) (actual time=52.465..60181.624 rows=2625 loops=1)

Notice here that expected rows is 3, but actual rows is a hell of a lot
higher. Try increasing stats collections for the columns on which
logdata_recent_1123085306_ix_t_fld_gtl is declared.

Also, the actual index scan is taking a long time. How recently have you
vacuum full'd?

Thanks,

Gavin

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Roger Hand 2005-08-19 07:35:23 Re: Query plan looks OK, but slow I/O - settings advice?
Previous Message Jeffrey W. Baker 2005-08-19 06:55:35 Re: Query plan looks OK, but slow I/O - settings advice?