Re: Help interpreting explain analyze output

From: Ole Tange <postgresql(dot)org(at)tange(dot)dk>
To:
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Help interpreting explain analyze output
Date: 2004-08-15 19:08:19
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0408152044320.22644@tigger.tange.dk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Tom Lane wrote:

> Ole Tange <postgresql(dot)org(at)tange(dot)dk> writes:
> > As I read it the output tells me what was done during the milliseconds:
>
> No, you have a fundamental misconception here. The notation means that
> the first output row from a plan step was delivered after X
> milliseconds, and the last row after Y milliseconds.

Thanks. For a novice tuner like me it would be nice if you could see more
easily where the time was spent. However, the output is _far_ more
intuitive that MySQL's.

> It is gonna take a while to sort 175000 rows ... but possibly increasing
> sort_mem would help.

It didn't. However, I could reformulate the DISTINCT query as a GROUP BY
on all the selected fields and this uses Hash aggregate which is far
faster.

Now I am curious: Why isn't DISTINCT implemented using a Hash aggregate?

/Ole

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-08-15 19:40:37 Re: Help interpreting explain analyze output
Previous Message Richard Poole 2004-08-15 18:24:08 Re: Help interpreting explain analyze output