Re: more massaging on pgxs postresql extension infrastructure

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: more massaging on pgxs postresql extension infrastructure
Date: 2004-08-12 07:34:16
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0408120925210.1998@sablons.cri.ensmp.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


Dear Peter,

> Am Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 16:25 schrieb Fabien COELHO:
> > (b) I think it is a key feature that one should be able to compile
> > contrib with the already installed postgresql, without having
> > to reconfigure.
>
> Why? I think it would be an entirely useless feature.

(1) this "entirely useless feature" would have simplified *my* little
life once for some tests I needed.

(2) I used contrib to test that pgxs works!
I think they are needed to test that it continues to work.

That is how I figured out that libgport was missing, because
I could not compile pbbench with PGXS.

(3) if there is an infrastructure for extensions, there is no reason
why we could not demonstrate it on contribs, if it is available
for tests anyway, and as it may be useful to other people.

--
Fabien Coelho - coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2004-08-12 08:03:17 Win32 Event log
Previous Message Martin Münstermann 2004-08-12 06:42:15 Re: 8.0.0beta1: -lpthread missing