From: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Tablespace patch review |
Date: | 2004-06-18 21:42:04 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.58.0406190740380.9005@linuxworld.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> Are we ripping out our initlocation code at the same time?
> >>
> >> Not done yet, but it's dead and should be removed as soon as a
> >> decent respect for the deceased permits ;-)
>
> > You want me to do the honors?
>
> Nah, I'll get it. I want to do some other small cleanup on that patch,
> too. (But Gavin, you're on the hook for a rewrite of the admin guide
> section about alternate locations into something about tablespaces...)
I can either replace the "Alternative Locations" section or make a higher
level reference to tablespaces under Server Administration in the main
index. What do people think?
Gavin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2004-06-18 21:44:36 | Re: Tablespace patch review |
Previous Message | Carlos Guzmán Álvarez | 2004-06-18 20:23:57 | Re: Timestamp format question |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2004-06-18 21:44:36 | Re: Tablespace patch review |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-18 20:23:10 | Re: Tablespace patch review |