| From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: new aggregate functions v2 |
| Date: | 2004-05-05 06:59:41 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.58.0405050853540.9381@sablons.cri.ensmp.fr |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Dear Robert,
> > (1) boolean-and and boolean-or aggregates named bool_and and bool_or.
> > they should correspond to standard sql every and some/any aggregates.
>
> Just a minor nibble, but could you add something to the documentation
> entries that these are postgresql implementation of the sql
> any/some/every aggregate functions.
Yep, that can be done.
> right now we have whole pages devoted to any/some for subqueries and
> arrays, I'd like to give people looking for the sql spec aggregate
> functions at least a chance of finding these.
Do you mean one or both of the following?
- add a note in the aggregate doc that they correspond to
EVERY and SOME/ANY standard aggregates.
- add a note somewhere else, maybe in the doc about arrays or subqueries,
that there are also aggregates with a non standard name.
if so, where precisely should it be put?
Thanks in advance,
--
Fabien Coelho - coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2004-05-05 07:30:14 | Re: Dollar Quoting doc patch--resend. |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2004-05-05 06:26:31 | Dollar Quoting doc patch--resend. |