Re: Usability, MySQL, Postgresql.org, gborg, contrib,

From: Jon Jensen <jon(at)endpoint(dot)com>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Usability, MySQL, Postgresql.org, gborg, contrib,
Date: 2004-04-28 12:45:06
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0404281243450.1501@louche.swelter.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

> >>Seriously - I'd like to raise my voice in favor of installing plpgsql
> >>in template1 by default. I haven't heard any good reason not to (nor
> >>even a bad reason).
>
> It has to work with older dumps that will try to recreate pl/pgsql
> themselves explicitly.

This wouldn't be a problem, though, would it? The dumps don't run inside a
transaction so after the failure to create PL/PgSQL because it already
exists, the import would continue as before.

Jon

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-04-28 13:09:01 Re: Nasty security bug with clustering
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-04-28 12:41:18 Re: tcl error