Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Date: 2004-04-23 12:56:13
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0404231455100.6454@sablons.cri.ensmp.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> > The specific details aren't especially relevant to this thread, though.
> > What is relevant is that we agree to a commitment that we will make
> > it easy to build modules outside the current Postgres build environment,
> > and that we will have an ongoing commitment to make sure that that keeps
> > working.

Maybe you should try to mimic apache "apxs" script behavior?
It allows to compile, install, configure new modules into apache.

pg_config is not convincing at the time:

shell> pg_config --includedir-server
/usr/local/pg750a/include/postgresql/server

shell> ls /usr/local/pg750a/include/postgresql/server
ls: /usr/local/pg750a/include/postgresql/server: No such file or directory

Too bad, server headers are not installed by default:-(

--
Fabien.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2004-04-23 12:58:41 Re: [HACKERS] What can we learn from MySQL?
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2004-04-23 12:53:44 Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions