Re: patches in the pipe?

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: patches in the pipe?
Date: 2004-04-23 07:35:37
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0404230932120.6454@sablons.cri.ensmp.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


Dear Bruce,

> > > > (1) Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:36:55 +0200 (CEST)
> > > > Subject: [PATCHES] aclitem accessor functions
> > > Would you repost and we can review it again.

> > > > (2) Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 19:35:57 +0200 (CEST)
> > > > Subject: [PATCHES] 'information_schema' considered a system schema
> > > I don't remember that one at all. Would you repost?

Well, I did that but nothing has appeared on the list yet:-(
I bounced them *again* but directly to you.

> I seem to be losing a lot of your patches, so I must be doing something
> wrong.

It seems I don't know how to post them maybe.

--
Fabien Coelho - coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-04-23 13:14:12 Re: patches in the pipe?
Previous Message Neil Conway 2004-04-23 07:01:26 ceiling() and power() (SQL2003)