From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_restore ignore error patch |
Date: | 2004-04-10 08:47:48 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.58.0404101036170.2356@honfleur |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
> > My tests suggest that a feature of pg_restore is that it is only
> > expected to work with its own server. Indeed, it generates some new
> > syntax, such as $$ quoting, which is not compatible with older servers.
> > This fact does not seem to appear in the documentation.
>
> Wrong. It does appear in the documentation, and it can also be disabled.
Good!
> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/app-pgdump.html says:
I looked briefly at *pg_restore* documentation, as I was interested in
pg_restore. But the logic is just mine;-)
Well, it means that you must decide a dump time if you may have to restore
in an older version. I can guess why it eased the implementation, but it
does not look good.
--
Fabien Coelho - coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2004-04-10 09:03:54 | Re: pg_restore ignore error patch |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-04-09 23:51:26 | Re: COPY for CSVs |