From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Syntax error reporting (was Re: [PATCHES] syntax error |
Date: | 2004-03-22 16:35:29 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.58.0403221729030.7217@sablons.cri.ensmp.fr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> > Maybe I missed something, but it seemed to me that strings are appended
> > on to the other, and there is no way back.
>
> But the string list is not constructed until the error actually occurs.
> You don't need a pop at that point --- the call stack is what it is.
>
> I think you are imagining that outer-level context hooks should be able
> to editorialize on what inner-level ones said (or perhaps vice versa?)
No.
I just missed the "error_context_stack" by focussing on "errcontext()",
which does not managed a stack at all, so I was quite puzzled. Now
it is clearer.
Thanks,
--
Fabien Coelho - coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2004-03-22 17:14:59 | Re: [PATCHES] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use |
Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2004-03-22 16:22:20 | Re: pg_autovacuum next steps |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2004-03-22 17:14:59 | Re: [PATCHES] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-22 15:12:01 | Re: Syntax error reporting (was Re: [PATCHES] syntax error position "CREATE FUNCTION" bug fix) |