| From: | Jon Jensen <jon(at)endpoint(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Further thoughts about warning for costly FK checks |
| Date: | 2004-03-18 17:05:12 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.58.0403181703360.3654@louche.swelter.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Richard Huxton wrote:
> On Thursday 18 March 2004 10:18, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > > though I'd be worried about the portability price paid to have one. Or
> > > are you concerned about whether a GUI could invoke it? I don't see why
> > > not --- the GUIs don't reimplement pg_dump, do they?
>
> Actually Tom, I think they do (where they have an export facility). How would
> you run pg_dump on a remote machine? (well, without building an RPC
> mechanism)
Can't the GUI just do "pg_dump -h remotehost ..."? Or do you mean
something else? I think the phpPgAdmin developers recommend using pg_dump
exactly because they don't want to reinvent that formidable wheel.
Jon
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-18 17:34:36 | Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-18 16:52:21 | Re: COPY formatting |