| From: | Sam Barnett-Cormack <s(dot)barnett-cormack(at)lancaster(dot)ac(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Louie Kwan <lkwan(at)nuvo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: EPOCH time vs PG timestamp |
| Date: | 2004-03-10 19:31:15 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.58.0403101930410.13570@short.lancs.ac.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
The PG timestamp has the advantage of actually being able to cover any
time, and be timezone-aware if you wish.
Epoch time, obviously, is more constrained.
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Louie Kwan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am doing a data warehouse project using postgresql and I need warehousing
> data from different operational systems, like, Remedy and NNM, etc...
>
> Some data is time sensetive, I am thinking to use epoch as the format of the
> time instead of Postgre Timestamp data type !!
>
> The challenge for me is that different operational systems are using
> different data format, for example, Remedy is using epoch time and NNM has
> it own format.. when I do ETL ... I think I need to choose a time format and
> I may prefer to use epoch time.
>
> Any comment or any experience ?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Best regards,
> Louie Kwan
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
--
Sam Barnett-Cormack
Software Developer | Student of Physics & Maths
UK Mirror Service (http://www.mirror.ac.uk) | Lancaster University
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vivek Khera | 2004-03-10 21:00:36 | Re: syslog slowing the database? |
| Previous Message | Mark Harrison | 2004-03-10 19:08:50 | Re: syslog slowing the database? |