On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> Now, what should we call it instead? I haven't come up with any
> compelling thoughts --- the best I can do is "big_sort_mem" or
> "single_sort_mem". Surely someone out there has a better idea.
vacuuming and indexing are not too frequent database administration tasks.
administration_mem ? admin_mem ? system_mem ? system_task_mem ?
systask_mem ? executive_mem ?
Anything may be chosen, but the point is to have a good comment within the
template configuration file.
I would nevertheless avoid "big".
What is big changes overtime with computers;-)
--
Fabien.