From: | Elliot Lee <sopwith(at)redhat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Something's not (de)compressing right |
Date: | 2003-12-09 16:28:49 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.58.0312090800090.17408@devserv.devel.redhat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Elliot Lee <sopwith(at)redhat(dot)com> writes:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2000-07/msg00483.php
> > I'm having this same problem with postgresql 7.3.4.
>
> You aren't having the "same" problem, because that UNION bug was fixed
> ages ago.
You're right. However, I saw the exact same symptoms, with a very similar
stack trace.
> > Easy to reproduce by running an 'INSERT' query.
>
> Let's see the test case then ...
A 'REINDEX' made the symptoms go away. Nice for me, unfortunate for fixing
postgresql. :\
I do have another bug related to vacuuming tables that contain binary
large objects, inside a UTF-8 encoded database. If that's not a known
issue, I'll work up a reproduction case for that.
-- Elliot
http://www.barbiecollectibles.com/shop/product.aspx?sku=B3449
One ring to rule the malls, a website to supply them. The Tolkien "Ken and
Barbie" dolls - now 60 bucks can buy them!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jack Coates | 2003-12-09 16:57:53 | Re: tuning questions |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-12-09 16:16:19 | Re: PostgreSQL port to pure Java? |