| From: | "David F(dot) Skoll" <dfs(at)roaringpenguin(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Juan Miguel <juanmime(at)ono(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Microsoft access verses postgresql |
| Date: | 2003-11-05 22:05:07 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.58.0311051703310.5941@shishi.roaringpenguin.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Juan Miguel wrote:
> Therefore, do you know a better Open Source DBMS than Access, that is
> easy to install and integrate with your applications ?
What is your target environment?
We sell a commercial program (http://www.canit.ca) that uses PostgreSQL
internally. For our Red Hat 8 and 9 Linux targets, installation is
extremely simple; it goes something like this:
./install
./init-database
I would imagine that you could fairly easily write comparable wrapper
installation programs for PostgreSQL on other platforms.
Regards,
David.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oli Sennhauser | 2003-11-05 23:27:03 | Re: data format problem for upgrede from 7.1->7.3 |
| Previous Message | Juan Miguel | 2003-11-05 21:57:35 | Postgres Web Page |