From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Inconsistencies in our SGML output |
Date: | 2003-08-19 08:16:25 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.56.0308191013170.4847@krusty.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Tom Lane writes:
> Does anyone know why the very same cross-reference,
> <xref linkend="reference">
> renders as "Part VI" here:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql.html
> and on the next page as "Part VI in PostgreSQL 7.4beta1 Documentation":
> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-syntax.html
> Given that we're building just one book now, the latter form seems
> overly verbose to me.
Apparently, there is a bug in the stylesheets. I'm looking at it.
> Another oddity can be seen in the table of contents for the plpgsql
> chapter,
> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/plpgsql.html
> Why is there no TOC entry for subsection 40.2.1? It seems to be made
> with <sect2> just the same as the other subsections.
The stylesheets deliberately don't make a TOC for a particular level if
it would consist of just one entry.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-08-19 08:18:19 | Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc? |
Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-08-17 15:06:19 | Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |