Re: No flamefest please, MySQL vs. PostgreSQL AGAIN

From: "David F(dot) Skoll" <dfs(at)roaringpenguin(dot)com>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: No flamefest please, MySQL vs. PostgreSQL AGAIN
Date: 2003-05-12 20:08:25
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.53.0305121606590.9086@shishi.roaringpenguin.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Mon, 12 May 2003, Naomi Walker wrote:

> We would be interested in replication, so reporting could be done against a
> different server than production.

And I'm interested in replication for failover purposes. Automatic
hot-failover isn't really required for my application, but a "warm"
failover that can have a mostly-up-to-date data set and be activated
within a few minutes would be very nice.

--
David.

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Travis Whitton 2003-05-12 21:11:47 Grant Question
Previous Message Naomi Walker 2003-05-12 19:46:43 Re: No flamefest please, MySQL vs. PostgreSQL AGAIN