Re: Error installing postgresql-7.3.2 (fixed, but Q

From: Jon Earle <je_pgsql(at)kronos(dot)honk(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Error installing postgresql-7.3.2 (fixed, but Q
Date: 2003-05-12 14:19:58
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.53.0305121017310.12375@kronos.honk.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 12 May 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> Jon Earle <je_pgsql(at)kronos(dot)honk(dot)org> writes:
> > On Thu, 8 May 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Should we take it out of configure?
>
> > Hmm.. this could be problematic. How then could one build binaries that
> > can be simply dropped onto nearly any system with assurances that it will
> > work?
>
> If you mean "drop them into nearly any random place in the filesystem",
> the answer is you can't. Not relying on shared libraries would do
> little to improve the situation. BINDIR and PKGLIBDIR are both
> hard-wired into various executables, and there may be other installation
> paths hard-wired as well.

No, not quite what I meant. I mean, if I want to drop it onto a Suse box,
or an Older RH installation, or someone's customized Gentoo, or some such,
where the shared libs might be different versions, I'd have some trouble,
yes? OTOH, a statically built version could be plopped onto virtually
anything out there (within reason of course).

Cheers!
Jon

--
Jon Earle

SAVE FARSCAPE http://www.savefarscape.com/

While it's okay to disagree with your friends and family, childish insults
do not express sovereignty.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason Hihn 2003-05-12 14:20:30 Arrays with MS Access?
Previous Message Doug McNaught 2003-05-12 13:58:31 Re: Caching Websites