From: | Jon Earle <je_pgsql(at)kronos(dot)honk(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Error installing postgresql-7.3.2 (fixed, but Q |
Date: | 2003-05-12 14:19:58 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.53.0305121017310.12375@kronos.honk.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 12 May 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jon Earle <je_pgsql(at)kronos(dot)honk(dot)org> writes:
> > On Thu, 8 May 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Should we take it out of configure?
>
> > Hmm.. this could be problematic. How then could one build binaries that
> > can be simply dropped onto nearly any system with assurances that it will
> > work?
>
> If you mean "drop them into nearly any random place in the filesystem",
> the answer is you can't. Not relying on shared libraries would do
> little to improve the situation. BINDIR and PKGLIBDIR are both
> hard-wired into various executables, and there may be other installation
> paths hard-wired as well.
No, not quite what I meant. I mean, if I want to drop it onto a Suse box,
or an Older RH installation, or someone's customized Gentoo, or some such,
where the shared libs might be different versions, I'd have some trouble,
yes? OTOH, a statically built version could be plopped onto virtually
anything out there (within reason of course).
Cheers!
Jon
--
Jon Earle
SAVE FARSCAPE http://www.savefarscape.com/
While it's okay to disagree with your friends and family, childish insults
do not express sovereignty.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jason Hihn | 2003-05-12 14:20:30 | Arrays with MS Access? |
Previous Message | Doug McNaught | 2003-05-12 13:58:31 | Re: Caching Websites |