From: | Sam Barnett-Cormack <s(dot)barnett-cormack(at)lancaster(dot)ac(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Sam Barnett-Cormack <s(dot)barnett-cormack(at)lancaster(dot)ac(dot)uk>, Daniel Seichter <daniel(at)dseichter(dot)de>, "" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Advantages and disadvantages of more than one dbserver |
Date: | 2003-07-03 21:18:03 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.50.0307032217040.19914-100000@short.lancs.ac.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Sam Barnett-Cormack wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Daniel Seichter wrote:
> >
> > > Today memory isn't expensive so with 512MB I can be shure, every user on
> > > this server might have enough to work without any timeout or waiting times
> > > greater then 2 seconds.
> >
> > If the database is at all large, you really want more memory than that.
> > I have a really quite large DB, but I am *really* struggling with 1GB
>
> We went from 512 Meg to 1.5 Gig and the change was tremendous. That box
> ran Apache/Postgresql/auth_ldap/LDAP and now has 800 Meg of cache mem and
> about 120 Megs of buffer routinely. I'd heartily recommend even a jump
> from just 1 to 1.5 gig if you can make it.
I want either a seperate (high-ish spec, high memory) box, or to not
have to use my workstation as a server :) But I don't think my employers
will put any more money into this project until it's fully finished.
--
Sam Barnett-Cormack
Software Developer | Student of Physics & Maths
UK Mirror Service (http://www.mirror.ac.uk) | Lancaster University
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-07-03 21:18:21 | Re: Advantages and disadvantages of more than one dbserver |
Previous Message | Daniel Seichter | 2003-07-03 21:13:50 | Re: Advantages and disadvantages of more than one dbserver |