From: | Achilleus Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Ugly group by problem |
Date: | 2006-03-30 10:20:23 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0603301317350.23284-100000@matrix.gatewaynet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
O Markus Schaber έγραψε στις Mar 29, 2006 :
> Hi, Achilleus,
>
> Achilleus Mantzios wrote:
>
> > foodb=# SELECT qoo.foo2,sum(qoo.foo3) from (SELECT mt.link_id as
> > foo,_int_union(array(select mt2.feat_id from markustest mt2 where
> > mt2.link_id=mt.link_id order by mt2.feat_id),'{}') as foo2,other::int4 as
> > foo3 from markustest mt) as qoo GROUP BY qoo.foo2;
> > foo2 | sum
> > --------+-----
> > {2} | 1
> > {5,23} | 13
> > {23} | 14
> > (3 rows)
>
> This is much like I intended to do it, but using "select distinct" in
> the inner select as I don't have _int_union here, and using a temporary
> table to collect the sets of link ids.
Just some facts:
sort(uniq(int[])) has the same effect as select DISTINCT... ORDER BY
DISTINCT. ORDER BY is ofcourse more intuitive and does not need
contrib/intarray.
In fact , i dont even remember why i didnt write the query with
DISTINCT... in the first place :)
>
> Markus
>
>
>
--
-Achilleus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Eugene E. | 2006-03-31 06:17:00 | Re: have you feel anything when you read this ? |
Previous Message | Achilleus Mantzios | 2006-03-30 08:46:44 | Re: [SQL] Flight numbers data |