From: | Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Proposal - Continue stmt for PL/pgSQL |
Date: | 2005-06-16 19:14:34 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0506162107230.13602-100000@kix.fsv.cvut.cz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz> writes:
> > BEGIN
> > CONTINUE WHEN i = 10;
> > RAISE NOTICE '---1---';
> > END;
>
> I find that really ugly and confusing. If we add a CONTINUE it's only
> sensible to allow it inside a loop --- otherwise it's just a nonstandard
> spelling of EXIT.
>
I played too much :-). But, there is something wich can complicate
implementation, if I disallow it inside block.
for ... LOOP
begin
continue;
end
end loop;
if I can use continue in begin and block I have easy rules for
implementation. I have to first find any outside loop. But I think it's no
really problem
Pavel Stehule
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2005-06-16 19:44:06 | Re: Proposal - Continue stmt for PL/pgSQL |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2005-06-16 19:06:57 | Re: Proposal - Continue stmt for PL/pgSQL |